Mutton, Yards. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and incompatible relationships (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). In the event that I’m not hot, could you be hot or otherwise not?: Physical-appeal analysis and relationship choices just like the a function of one’s very own elegance. Psychological Technology, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other romantic matchmaking. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of aspiration. When you look at the J. McV. Have a look (Ed.), Identity additionally the choices conditions (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Push. [ Hyperlinks ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Forecasting matchmaking matchmaking fate that have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ direction: Just who and you can what’s asked issues. Personal Dating, thirteen, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you may marital top quality into the newly weds: A few based approach. Diary off Identity and Societal Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A beneficial. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. R. (2006). Observed similarity and relationships victory among dating partners: An idiographic means. [ Hyperlinks ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, Good. (2006). Internet dating. Washington, DC: Declaration to the Pew Internet & American Lifestyle Investment. Recovered , out-of [ Hyperlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Examining the precision off predictions in the relationships relationships: Exactly how and exactly why perform lovers’ predictions range from men and women from observers? Personality and Public Psychology Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing circumstances regarding initiation regarding heterosexual relationships. Papers presented from the Earliest Global Fulfilling to the Individual Matchmaking, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Record away from Public and private Relationship, 23, 865-880
Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually actual resemblance important for attraction? A meta-research away from genuine and you may identified resemblance. Log away from Personal and personal Dating, twenty-five, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]
Digital relationships and you can digital relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated intimate dating
Morry, M. Meters. (2005). Dating pleasure as the an excellent predictor out-of resemblance ratings; A test of interest-similarity theory. Record out of Societal and personal Relationships, twenty two, 561-584. [ Backlinks ]
Morry, M. M. (2007). The fresh appeal-similarity hypothesis among cross-intercourse loved ones: Dating fulfillment, recognized parallels, and you can worry about-providing perceptions. Record regarding Social and private Matchmaking, 24, 117-138. [ Links ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you may extension of one’s SVR idea of dyadic pairing. Log regarding ily, 44, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll divorce proceedings: A great 14-seasons longitudinal examination of black people and you may white people. Log out of Public and private Relationships, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The fresh like formula Fits thinks it has got discovered a formula to have governing the web relationships company: A technical strategy to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Right. Organization 2.0 Journal. Retrieved to your out of [ Website links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Satu mare sexy women Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Identity parallels inside the couples. Personality and you will Private Distinctions, forty five, 533-535. [ Website links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Mate preferences: Exactly what attributes manage folk notice within their short-label intimate and you can much time-title intimate people? Record off Psychology and Peoples Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Website links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The new character of your care about in the initiation and span of public telecommunications. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will in conflict dating (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]